🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.