🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted voters with promises to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. However, after he assumed office, there was minimal attention to the cost of living. This shifted after price-fatigued citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, his team launched a hastily assembled effort to address affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—filled with absurdity, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Grocery Store Reality

Merely 48 hours post-election, the president began his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their concerns as unimportant, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” proved highly misleading and inaccurate. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Official statistics show the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, the price of beef climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—in part due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in five of the six food categories monitored by the government’s price index, including animal proteins (rising over 4%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. Since election day, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the fact that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump claimed that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, despite government figures indicate they are $3.19.

Confronted by actual conditions and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently warned that his “prices are down” message portrayed him as disconnected from typical Americans. Many citizens are frustrated about rising costs after assurances of decreases. In response, aides proposed a simple solution: roll back certain import taxes. The logical move contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With some tariffs being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will likely announce that he has lowered costs once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he had started. In another instance, while speaking fast-food leaders, he stated that “this is the golden age of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to countless households facing hardships—especially when millions face losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a recent poll conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter consider them positive. A separate survey found that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s chief financial officer, recently contradicted claims of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Pointing to this weakness, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

In response to public dismay about living costs, Trump proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” For many struggling Americans, it seems like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about huge budget deficits—will approve such a plan. This idea could increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by injecting cash into the economy.

Another supposed fix for cost issues involved creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could lower housing costs. However, the truth is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—frequently cutting them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the overall cost homeowners pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more blamed Biden for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is unfounded and inaccurate claims. Actually, the former president left a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He worries that if large states like major economies enter a downturn, the US could face a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and price increases often falls. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to hold down prices, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans cannot handle.