🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.